Your Response Form: Belonging Vs. Transaction

My 5-year old daughter is an Agent of Good. She has her own little desk in my office and she regularly colours, draws and writes letters “in HQ with mama”. I have found many treasures on my desk. The other day, I found this.

"My name just seemed to belong there mummy" - Agent Sadie, 5

I said “Sadie, tell me the story about this” and she looked at me with her big, bright eyes and said “my name just seemed to belong there mummy”. She charged away, curls bouncing.

Do your response forms make your donors feel like they belong?

Or do they have barcodes, mousetype-weasel-words and endless check boxes for remaining anonymous, exchanging their name, how their name should appear for recognition purposes, legacies, volunteering, events… Are you creating a feeling of belonging or is this just a transaction?

Now don’t get me wrong. Inviting your beloved donors to connect with you in more meaningful ways is the only way to cultivate your annual program. But do they ALL belong on EVERY coupon you do?

No.

Here at the Agents of Good, we love thoughtful and appropriate check boxes. Who doesn’t love to check stuff off? But put them where they belong – in welcome kits, newsletter packs, surveys and the like.

Speaking of check boxes, here are the top 6 things that your donor should be (mentally) checking as a YES when they send you back your response form:

  • Do I feel good? (without this one, the other ones don’t matter)
  • Do I know what I’m being asked for? (the answer is: ask for one thing, and one thing only – and then make it easy for your donor to give it)
  • And now what? (Hopefully the postage-paid envelope is the next thing they grab. If your reply envelope needs postage, if it has the “your postage helps save money” message or is otherwise a separate thing for me fill out, you’re losing interest)
  • Will my gift make a difference? (if this isn’t crystal clear in your letter and/or lift note, scratch it and start over)
  • Do I either need to squint-and-hold-close or lean-and-hold-back to read this?  (yes, it should be big type, a big form and lots of white space. Oh, and yes, even if your logo has to be a bit smaller.)
  • Is there possibly small type here that means I am giving up a vital organ or first born to this charity? (You’re asking donors to do one thing: give today. That’s it. That’s all. Sure, you can do an e-mail follow up and drive gifts online, or do a phone follow up and take donations by phone. All good stuff. But your response form should speak to donors who have pens in their hand and are likely to give by mail. Or else your segmentation sucks. And that’s another blog.)

If it feels like a mortgage application or if it feels like  “transaction”, start over. Not because you’ll raise more money. Not because it will be easy for donors of all ages and abilities to read. Do it because you want to make your donors feel good. You want them, with pen in trembling hand, full of emotion and all their instincts are saying not just “Yes! I’ll give today”, but saying “HELL YEAH! WHERE DO I SIGN?!”

6 Responses to “Your Response Form: Belonging Vs. Transaction”

  1. David Love June 13, 2012 7:28 pm #

    Great stuff Jen. Just as we need to replace the word “data” with “donors,” or better “partners,” we need to rename the ubiquitous Reply Form.

    This magical element of the package invites our donors to heal our ailing world. It should be simple, clear and passionate.

    I “repy” to my cable company or my dentist.

    When I give to a cause important to me, I do more than “repy”. I celebrate. I dream. I hope.

    Time spend on this invitation is time well spent.

    • Jen Love June 14, 2012 9:46 pm #

      Dad! Brilliant! Thanks to you we’ve almost banned the word “data”, and now we may need a new name for the form — I LOVE the “hope form”. But I think you meant “reply” instead of “repy”. :)

  2. Christina Attard June 12, 2012 7:37 pm #

    “And now what? (Hopefully the postage-paid envelope is the next thing they grab. If your reply envelope needs postage, if it has the “your postage helps save money” message or is otherwise a separate thing for me fill out, you’re losing interest)”

    Yep, when we talk about millennial donors and the need to act immediately when they are asked through mobile giving, the same goes for direct-mail donors – the pre-stamped BRE is their “giving app”. Anyways, when a charity asks me to give via a certain medium – like direct mail – why not give me the tool to respond asap? I never have stamps in the house anyway, so once there is the additional step of driving somewhere to get postage, the whole process is lost.

    Thanks for a good post, Christina @GPtekkie

    • Jen Love June 14, 2012 9:45 pm #

      Thanks Christina! AMAZING about BRE being the “giving app”. I smell a whole new blog a brewin’… :)

  3. Tara June 12, 2012 5:18 pm #

    Loved this post Jen! Isn’t that what we all just want to do, is belong? I also loved how Agent Sadie inspired your blog post.

    • Jen Love June 12, 2012 7:29 pm #

      Thanks Tara! Belonging is the new “engaging”… :) Always appreciate your comments lady!

Leave a Reply